%0 Journal Article
%@ 0030-6002
%A  Heltai Nóra
%A  Baráth Zoltán Lajos
%A  Kereszty Éva Margit
%D 2016
%F publicatio:12263
%I Akadémiai Kiadó
%J ORVOSI HETILAP
%N 11
%P 430-435
%T Fogászati jellegű sérülések törvényszéki vizsgálata
%U http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/12263/
%V 157
%X INTRODUCTION: Documentation and evaluation of dental injuries  in forensic medicine are rather problematic. It needs a  professional work up why dental injuries are out of focus,  and how the diagnosis, pattern and treatment are influenced  by novel approaches of dentistry. AIM: The aims of the  authors were to characterize dental injuries, to compare  their own findings to literature data concerning the type and  characteristics of injuries, and propose a diagnostic  workflow. METHOD: Expert's reports between 2009 and 2013 at  the Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Szeged  were reviewed. RESULTS: Review of about 7000 reports revealed  only 20 cases with dental injury, which is in contrast with  literature data indicating a significantly higher frequency  of dental injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of  "dental cases" was low, there were several additional cases  where the trauma probably affected the teeth but the injury  was  not documented. In future more attention is needed in  forensic evaluation of the  mechanism, therapeutic strategy  and prognosis of dental injuries. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(11),  430-435.
%Z FELTÖLTŐ: Nemesvári Zoltánné - zoltanne.nemesvari@ek.szte.hu